Microsegmentation allows for far more precise isolation of assets and workloads, reducing the spread and recovery time of ransomware attacks by 21.4%. This precision is crucial in minimizing the impact of such threats.
Segmentation is increasingly tied to financial outcomes through cyber insurance. Insurers are starting to require or view segmentation positively, which can lead to reduced premiums and better claim approvals. Additionally, mature segmentation simplifies compliance with regulatory obligations.
The leading barriers are network complexity, high implementation costs, and internal resistance. These challenges are particularly pronounced in organizations with larger and older IT estates, where legacy infrastructure adds both expense and operational risk.
Limited asset coverage leaves critical systems and functions exposed to lateral movement and attacks. Only 30% of North American enterprises extend segmentation across more than two business areas, which can significantly undermine their ability to contain threats effectively.
Fewer North American firms list Zero Trust as a driver for segmentation, even though it ranks higher globally. This weak emphasis can be attributed to a lack of understanding or prioritization of Zero Trust principles, which are crucial for enhancing overall security resilience.
Centralized management platforms are essential for streamlining processes, enforcing consistency, and advancing policy discipline across diverse systems and environments. Without these platforms, enterprises struggle to maintain and update their segmentation policies effectively, slowing their progress toward microsegmentation.
The 21.4% improvement in ransomware containment is a clear indicator of the effectiveness of microsegmentation. It not only reduces the spread and recovery time of attacks but also enhances overall operational continuity and security posture, making it a critical investment for enterprises looking to strengthen their defenses.
